He foreclosed not one's future but one's life. When he murders, he does not just tamper with one's life, he takes it from one. But most importantly, he, the Looter has not tampered with one's life beyond one's ability to reclaim it.īut the Murderer is patently different. In fact, a thousand and one things could happen to him. He could become a victim of attack of other desperate citizens, he could be duped, he could suffer some other social consequences. In a worse scenario where all things are not equal, the Looter might still get away initially but he would be vulnerable to a variety of other variables. Reparations could then be made for the abrasions. Many injuries caused could then be healed. Many of the damages done by the Looter could then be indemnified. When he has been brought to book, the stolen money would be retrieved and be forfeited to the country and be expended in the interest of the citizens. With due process and using the Laws of the land, the Looter could be brought to book. It robs the society of comfort and prosperity.
He tampered with so many lives and their progress as well as their well being. When the Looter loots, he mortgages the lives of many. The Looter could steal as much as he or she wants and seek to enjoy the filthy wealth. Emma Goldman, a Lithuanian, North American activist "The ultimate end of all revolutionary social change is to establish the sanctity of human life, the dignity of man, the right of every human being to liberty and well-being." Édgar Filiberto Ramírez, a Venezuelan actor and former journalist. For me, the value of life is absolute, with no concessions. "For me, no ideological or political conviction would justify the sacrifice of a human life.